More changes to the land use planning process in Ontario will take effect on September 3, 2019.
Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, S.O. 2019, c. 9, which received Royal Assent on June 6, 2019, amends 13 statues across multiple ministries that impact municipalities and reform the land use planning process.
The changes taking effect on September 3, 2019 include significant amendments to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13 and the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017, S.O. 2017, c. 23, Sched. 1.
Amendments to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act taking effect on September 3, 2019 include:
- The removal of restrictions on a parties’ ability to adduce evidence or call and/or examine witnesses during Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (“LPAT”) hearings;
- Limiting submissions by non-parties to a proceeding before the LPAT to written submissions only. The LPAT may still require such non-parties to be examined or be required to produce evidence; and,
- Requiring a mandatory case management conference for certain appeals(official plans, zoning by-laws, plan of subdivisions) to the LPAT under the Planning Act.
Amendments to the Planning Act taking effect on September 3, 2019 include:
- Reducing the timelines for municipalities to make decisions on planningapplications before an appeal can be launched:
- For Official Plan Amendments: the new timeline is 4 months (120 days)where it is currently 7 months (210 days)
- For Zoning By-law Amendments: the new timeline is 3 months (90 days)where it is currently 5 months (150 days)
- For Plans of Subdivision Applications: the new timeline is 4 months (120days) where it is currently 6 months (180 days)
- Removing the provisions which restrict the grounds of appeal for official plans and zoning by-laws to inconsistency and non-conformity to higher order planning instruments;
- Restricting third party appeals of plan of subdivision decisions and non-decisions on official plans and official plan amendments;
- Permitting additional residential units by authorizing two residential units in a house, as well as a residential unit in a building or structure ancillary to a house;
- Allowing a Minister to require a municipality to adopt or establish a development permit system that applies to a specified area; and,
- Allowing the use of inclusionary zoning around major transit station areas and/or areas where a development permit system is required by the Minister.
Should you have any questions with respect to the impact of the Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, S.O. 2019, c. 9, on your development applications or appeals, please do not hesitate to contact us.
About Loopstra Nixon LLP
Loopstra Nixon is a full-service Canadian business and public law firm dedicated to serving clients involved in business and finance, litigation and dispute resolution, municipal, land use planning and development, and commercial real estate. Major financial institutions, insurance companies, municipal governments, and real estate developers along with corporate organizations and individuals are among the wide range of clients we are proud to serve.
The foregoing has been prepared for clients of Loopstra Nixon LLP. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the information contained herein should not be relied on as legal advice; specific advice should be obtained in each individual case. No responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of material herein is accepted by the authors or Loopstra Nixon LLP. If advice concerning specific circumstances is required, we would be pleased to be of assistance.
©2019 Loopstra Nixon LLP. All rights reserved.
This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.