Ryan is a driven associate practicing in the commercial litigation group at Loopstra Nixon. He joined the firm in 2017 as a law student and returned for his articles. Ryan has experience in a broad range of civil, commercial and construction litigation matters. He has represented clients in the Ontario Court of Appeal, Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court and a variety of tribunals. He currently sits as a section executive of the Canadian Bar Association Civil Litigation Section.
As a law student, Ryan developed his advocacy skills at Queen’s Legal Aid Clinic, was the vice president of Queen’s Law Litigation Society, an executive member of Queen’s Sustainability and Environmental Law Club, a radio announcer for Pro Bono Radio (affiliated with Pro Bono Students Canada), the features editor of Queen’s law newspaper (Juris Diction), and a varsity athlete for Queen’s triathlon team and ultimate frisbee team.
Ryan completed his J.D. at Queen’s University, where he was awarded the Leipnik Award - Professional Responsibility and Skills and the M.A. Murray Award in his graduating year.
In his spare time, Ryan enjoys hiking, cycling, travel, a variety of competitive sports, reading, and spending time with family and friends.
Representative Client Work
- (Campbell v. 1493951 Ontario Inc.) Representing a commercial tenant, Ryan Wilson successfully responded to an application for relief from forfeiture by a sub-tenant who had misled the tenant and landlord about the legality of his retail cannabis business.
Legal Qualifications, Bar Admissions and Memberships
Canadian Bar Association (CBA) – 2019/20 Section Executive of the Civil Litigation Section
Ontario Bar Association (OBA)
Education and Designations
Barrister and Solicitor, Ontario
J.D., Queen’s University Law School
B.Sc. (Hons), Life Sciences, Queen’s University
Areas of Practice
- Preparing your client during an extended examination for discovery: What can you discuss with your client?
- The Delicate Dance of Partial Settlement Agreement: Pierringer and Mary Carter Agreements
- The Anti-Deprivation Rule: Construction and Contracting Parties Cannot Rely on Liquidated Damages Clauses that are Triggered by Bankruptcy or Insolvency